Skip to main content

Keynote Talk - Cancer treatment in the era of precision medicine

Abstract

A traditional approach to cancer treatment generally involves “one-size-fits-all” treatments and procedures (e.g., chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery), which is focused largely at fighting a particular type of cancer (e.g., liver, lung, colorectal). However, this approach ignores the unique nature of an individual patient’s cancer, despite the fact that the complex genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity of an individual patient’s cancer/tumor has a profound influence on the clinical responses to targeted anticancer therapies. Genetic sequencing of tumors is conducted for only a small number of patients (~2%), and the large number (>4.5 M) of options and potential for drug-drug interactions have precluded widespread adoption of combination therapies. Current approach to treatment response planning and assessment also lacks an efficient method to consolidate biomarker changes into a holistic understanding of treatment response.

Major goals of successful combination therapy include the ability to: (a) cover most of the patient’s aberrations with a minimal number of drugs, (b) achieve enhanced effectiveness through drug synergy, (c) reduce the frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs) and (d) minimize the potential to develop drug resistance. While the majority of research on chemotherapies focus on cellular and genetic mechanisms of resistance, there are numerous patient-specific and tumor-specific measures that contribute to treatment response. Development of effective combination therapy is also challenging because many cancer drugs act on intersecting signaling pathways and thus can potentially interfere or antagonize each other. One approach to identify effective combinations is by precise targeting of synergistic combinations, which exhibit enhanced therapeutic efficacy when combined at lower doses. However, identification of synergistic drug combinations is often a labor- and resource-intensive process. We developed a precise, multimodal computational model that can leverage clinically-available measurements to optimize treatment selection and schedules for patients.

Speaker Biography

Dr. Igor F. Tsigelny is an expert in structural biology, molecular modeling, bioinformatics, structure-based drug design and personalized cancer medicine. He published >200 articles, 4 scientific books and around 15 patents. The book ‘Protein Structure Prediction: Bioinformatic Approach’ that he edited has been called ‘The Bible of all current prediction techniques’ by BioPlanet Bioinformatics Forums. His computational study of molecular mechanisms of Parkinson’s disease was included in the US Department of Energy publication ‘Decade of Discovery’ where the best computational studies of the decade 1999–2009 have been described. He is a Professor in the UC San Diego and CSO of CureMatch Inc. (San Diego).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Past Conference Report - Cancer Research

With great support from our Collaborators and Organizing Committee, PULSUS Conferences successfully completed the “Cancer 2018” which was held at Edinburgh, Scotland on March 26-27, 2018. We would like to thank our Keynote Speakers for the conference - Hiroshi Kobayashi , Chiba University, Japan, William T. Beck , University of Illinois, USA, Shalini Gupta , King George Medical College, India, Antonio Gomez-Munoz , University Of The Basque Country, Spain, Barbara DeVivo , Westmont University, USA. for their support in making this event a great success. We would like to extend our thanks to our collaborators “ Sudanese Medical Research Association ”, “ Uganda Cancer Society ” and “ Pharmaceutical Society of Uganda ” for their constant support. It wouldn’t have been possible without the support of our Media Partners who helped us in promoting this event. We thank our Media partners for their support in helping us reach a greater audience. We also would like to thank all o...

Poster Presentation - The Immunogradient of CD8+ cell density in the tumour-stroma interface zone predicts overall survival of patients with hormone receptor-positive invasive ductal breast carcinoma

Abstract Statement of the Problem: Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are associated with better prognosis in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer (1, 2), and TIL assessment by digital image analysis (DIA) has been successfully implemented in colorectal and other cancers (3). However, results in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer (HRBC) based on manual scoring remain contradictory (2). Here we used an automated DIA method to extract the prognostic value of novel Immunogradient indicators in CD8+ cell density profiles in HRBC. Methodology & Theoretical Orientation: Surgically excised HRBC samples from 102 patients were immunohistochemically stained for CD8, digitized and analyzed by the HALO™ platform. The DIA data were subsampled by a hexagonal grid and explicit rules were then used to extract the tumor-stroma interface zone (IZ) and compute novel Immunogradient indicators from TIL density profiles across the IZ. The prognostic value was evaluated by sur...

Poster Presentation - Influence of NECC (Nutrition and Exercise Center for Cancer Patients) on survival and body composition in Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients

Abstract BACKGROUND : Gastrointestinal cancer patients are particularly predisposed to develop cancer cachexia. Cachectic patients are characterized by loss of adipose tissue as well as skeletal muscle wasting which has a tremendous impact on quality of life and survival (1, 4). In terms of improvement for this multifactorial syndrome, Klinikum rechts der Isar (MRI) in Munich, Germany has founded NECC, a treatment concept including nutrition intervention and an individual training program. METHODS : In this study we focused on patients with pancreatic (n =15) and upper gastrointestinal cancer (n = 21). Body composition using CT images was analyzed initially, 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after initial visit of NECC (Image 1). To underline the outcome, NECC patients were matched to adequate partners who correspond in age, gender, diagnosis with TNM classification and type of surgery. The control group does not receive any further support concerning nutrition and physical exercise...